COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPORTIONAL INTEGRAL DERIVATIVE (PID) AND MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL (MPC) FOR SHIP HEADING CONTROL
COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPORTIONAL INTEGRAL DERIVATIVE (PID) AND MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL (MPC) FOR SHIP HEADING CONTROL
Baity Jannaty
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Muhammadun
Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Kiki Mustaqim
Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v14i3.44356
ABSTRACT
In this paper discussed about ship heading control problem. Ship heading control is one of the ship control problem in the application in the marine field. Controllers are needed to increase the level of safety when the ship is maneuvering. With rudder angle as input control, the heading angle controlled therefore it can reach reference heading angle with minimum energy. Due to the maneuver characteristics, the rudder efficiency for large ships can be poor under slow-speed conditions. Therefore, to maintain the safe navigation of ships, accurate heading control research is crucial. In this research we use Nomoto model, considering only one degree of freedom, that is yaw. The ships used as model is Warship Class Corvette SIGMA. Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control is used on that ship as controller. In this research, we compare two method for control the heading angle, that is Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) and Model Predictive Control (MPC). The urgency of the comparison between both method is to provide control considerations applicable to the Warship Class Corvette SIGMA. PID is a controller that determine the presition of an instrumentation system with feedback characteristic on the system. MPC is a control technique, which embeds optimization within feedback to deal with systems subject to constraints on inputs and states. From the simulation result, MPC can compansate the disturbance better than PID. The time to reach reference angle when controlled using MPC faster than using PID. The results show the advantage of MPC for dealing with the system dynamics over PID, also could be designed for faster and more complex system dynamics even in presence of constraints.
Keywords: Ship heading control, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), Model Predictive Control (MPC), rudder angle
REFERENCES
[1] Fossen, T.I. (1994). Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles. Hoboken : Wiley.
[2] Li, Z dan Sun, J. (2012). Disturbance Compensating Model Predictive Control With Application to Ship Heading Control. IEEE Transaction On Control System Technology, Vol. 20, No.1, Page 257-267.
[3] Ogata, Katsuhiko. (2001). Modern Control Engineering. Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River. NJ, USA.
[4] C. Zhang, L. Wan and Y. Liu. (2019). "Ship Heading Control Based on Fuzzy PID Control". 34rd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC). Jinzhou, China. pp. 607-612, doi: 10.1109/YAC.2019.8787601.
[5] Chen, C.; Delefortrie, G.; Lataire. (2021). E. Effects of water depth and speed on ship motion control from medium deep to very shallow water. Ocean Eng, 231, 109102.
[6] Mucha, P.; Dettmann, T.; Ferrari, V.; el Moctar, O. (2019). Experimental investigation of free-running ship manoeuvers under extreme shallow water conditions. Appl. Ocean Res, 83, 155–162.
[7] Lataire, E.; Vantorre, M. (2017). Hydrodynamic interaction between ships and restricted waterways. Int. J. Marit. Eng, 159.
[8] Tomera, Miroslaw. (2017). Fuzzy Self-tuning PID Controller for a Ship Autopilot. Proceedings, month 6, pages 93-103.
[9] Mishra, Pradeep & Panigrah, S & Das, Swarup & Dept, Mechanical & Milit, Pune & Email,. (2015). Ships Steering Autopilot Design by Nomoto Model. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics (IJMER). 3. 2321-5747.
[10] Fossen. (2011). Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodinamics and Motion Control. John Willy, Ltd.
[11] Bao Yao, Jie Yang*, Qingnian Zhang, Zhiqiang Guo, Rong Hu. (2018). Research and Comparison of Automatic Control Algorithm for Unmanned Ship. 3rd International Conference on Control and Robotics Engineering.
[12] M Y Santoso. (2017). Rudder-roll stabilization using fgs-pid controller forsigma-e warship. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.855 012044.
[13] Job van Amerongen. (2003). Ship Steering. Control Systems, Robotics, and Automation - Vol. XX.
[14] Qin, J dan Badgwell, T. An Overview Of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology. Department of Chemical Engineering. Rice University. Houston, TX 77251.
[15] M H Moradi, M R Katebi, Predictive PID Control for Ship Autopilot Design. (2001). IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 375-380, ISSN 1474-6670.
[16] Gyoungwoo Lee, S. Surendran, Sang-Hyun Kim. (2009). Algorithms to control the moving ship during harbour entry, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Volume 33, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 2474-2490, ISSN 0307-904X.
[17] Camacho and Bordons. (2007). Model Predictive Control. Springer. London.
141 | KADIKMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
[18] S. Qin and T. Badgwell. (2003). A Survey of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology. Control Eng. Practice, vol. 11, pp.733–764.
[19] Rawlings and D. Mayne. (2009). Model Predictive Control Theory and Design. Madison, WI: Nob Hill Publishing.
[20] Li, Z dan Sun, J. (2012). Disturbance Compensating Model Predictive Control With Application to Ship Heading Control. IEEE Transaction On Control System Technology, Vol. 20, No.1, Hal 257-267.
[21] Subchan, S.; Syaifudin, W. H.; Asfihani, T. (Juni,2014). Ship Heading Control Of Corvette-Sigma With Disturbances Using Model Predictive Control. Far East Journal of Applied Mathematics, Vol:87, Issue: 3.
[22] Wang L. (2009). Model predictive control system design and implementation using MATLAB (Springer Science & Business Media)
[23] Camacho E F and Bordons C A. (2012). Model predictive control in the process industry (Springer Science & Business Media)
[24] Naveen dan Manikandan. (Juni, 2014). Model Predictive Controller for Ship Heading Control. International Journal of Industrial Electronics and Electrical Engineering, ISSN: 2347-6982, Vol: 2, Issue:6.
[25] Blanke, Mogens, Christensen. (1993). Rudder-Roll Damping Autopilot Robustness due to Sway-Yaw-Roll Couplings. In 10th Ship Control Systems Symposium, Ottawa 25-29 Oct. (pp. 31).
[26] Jannaty, B. (2018). Penerapan Model Predictive Control (MPC) untuk Permasalahan Kendali Haluan pada Kapal Perang Korvet Kelas SIGMA. Tugas Akhir Departemen Matematika ITS.
Published
25-12-2023
Issue
Vol.14, No.3, hal. 128-141, 2023
Pages
128-141
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kadikma
How to Cite
Jannaty, B., Muhammadun., & Mustaqim, K. (2023). Comparison between proportional integral derivative (PID) and model predictive control (MPC) for ship heading control. Kadikma, 14(3), pp.128-141. https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v14i3.44356